PW:Staff Forum: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 80:
: I agree with differentiating between the two types of maps. If we put them under "Removed" only, it'll give the impression that those maps are ''never'' accessible, which isn't the case for some. I agree with the suggestion above mine by Cyberus, calling them "event" maps is a good idea imo. <span style="color:#fcba03;font-weight:bold"> ~ [[User:Pumpkinsnuffle|@basil]]</span> 15:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
: i think solution 2 would work the best, and i also agree with what Cyberus said. calling it "event maps" would work better because we cant really guarantee if these maps ever come back again, while still showing that it used to be in the game before. it's just quite weird to put maps that have came back to the game under the same category with ones that were completely removed, like space knights v1 for example. <span style="color:#fcba03;font-weight:bold"> ~ [[User:Oofgod|@oofgod]]</span> 16:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
: works w me. would have sfoth revived be under removed. if a map hasnt returned for multiple phestivals/events where other maps have returned, and theyve only returned like once, id be inclined to just put it under removed and note in trivia or some stuff that it came back this one specific time. using the word phrase would workkkk ~~
== Resolved ==
| |||